Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Waffen v. United States Department of Health & Human Services

799 F.2d 911 (1986)
From our private database of 18,800+ case briefs...

Waffen v. United States Department of Health & Human Services

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
799 F.2d 911 (1986)

Facts

Virginia Waffen (plaintiff) was a patient of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). There, Waffen underwent an x-ray, and a radiologist’s report recommended a follow-up examination for an apparent mass lesion. The radiologist’s report was misplaced by NIH personnel and not included in Waffen’s file. Seven months later, an x-ray from another hospital showed that Waffen had terminal cancer. Waffen brought suit against the United States Department of Health and Human Services (DHS) (defendant) under the Federal Tort Claims Act for medical malpractice by NIH. The district court found that Waffen failed to prove that the seven-month delay in treatment was the proximate cause of her terminal condition. The claim was dismissed. Waffen appealed. The United States Court of Appeals granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Swygert, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 498,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 498,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 18,800 briefs, keyed to 985 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial

Here's why 498,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students.
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet.
  • 18,800 briefs - keyed to 985 casebooks.
  • Uniform format for every case brief.
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language.
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions.
  • Top-notch customer support.