New York Court of Appeals
133 N.E. 437 (N.Y. 1921)
Wagner (plaintiff) and his cousin Herbert boarded a train operated by International Ry. (railroad) (defendant). The two stood on the platform of the train. The platform had doors, but the conductor failed to close them. As the train rounded a corner and approached a bridge, Herbert was thrown out of the car. The train proceeded across the bridge and stopped on the other side. Once there Wagner got off the train and began walking across the bridge, hoping to find his cousin’s body. Wagner alleges that the train’s conductor invited him to do so, and even followed him with a torch. The railroad disputes this allegation. While walking, Wagner lost his footing and fell off the bridge. The railroad was charged with injuries resulting from both the cousin’s injuries and the injuries suffered by Wagner in attempting to rescue his cousin.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Cardozo, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 240,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.