Wagner v. State
Supreme Court of Utah
122 P.3d 599 (Utah 2005)
Wagner (plaintiff) was standing in line at K-Mart when she was pulled to the ground from behind by Giese, resulting in injury to Wagner. Giese was mentally disabled and was under the supervision and control of the State of Utah (state) (defendant) at the time of the incident. Wagner brought suit against the state. Wagner did not claim that Giese’s action was the result of an involuntary spasm. The state argued that the attack constituted the intentional tort of battery. The state was statutorily immune from being sued for battery. Wagner argued that the attack was not battery, because Giese could not form the intent to harm through the contact, an element of a battery claim. The trial court agreed with the state and held that the attack constituted battery. The trial court dismissed the case for failure to state a claim on account of the state’s immunity. The appellate court affirmed. Wagner appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Wilkins, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.