Wallis v. Smith
Court of Appeals of New Mexico
22 P.3d 682 (2001)
Peter Wallis (plaintiff) and Kellie Rae Smith (defendant) commenced a sexual relationship that was conditioned on Smith’s use of birth control. Wallis made clear that he did not want children and would not continue relations with Smith if she stopped using birth control. Wallis himself did not take any precautions against Smith’s pregnancy. Without telling Wallis, Smith stopped using birth control. She became pregnant and gave birth to a daughter. Pursuant to its version of the Uniform Parentage Act (UPA), New Mexico provides for mandatory child support. Wallis sued Smith for the economic injury arising from his obligation to support their daughter. His claims included fraud and breach of contract. The trial court dismissed his suit on the grounds that public policy barred recovery. Wallis appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Bosson, J.)
Concurrence (Alarid, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.