William J. Clinton, President of the United States v. City of New York
United States Supreme Court
524 U.S. 417 (1998)
In 1996, Congress passed the Line Item Veto Act (LIVA) to permit the President to strike down single items of Congressional spending in otherwise constitutional appropriations bills. In 1997, President Clinton (defendant) struck down two provisions in congressional acts relating to New York’s Medicaid funding and a capital gains tax elimination provision for cooperative farmers. New York and a group of Idaho farmers (plaintiffs) filed two separate actions in district court alleging that the LIVA was an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power to the President by Congress. The district court held that LIVA was unconstitutional and President Clinton appealed directly to the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)
Concurrence (Kennedy, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Scalia, J.)
Dissent (Breyer, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 153,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,400 briefs, keyed to 183 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.