Logourl black
From our private database of 13,800+ case briefs...

Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
350 F.2d 445 (1965)


Facts

Walker-Thomas Furniture Co. (Walker) (plaintiff) owned and operated a retail furniture store. It routinely leased items to customers under lease agreements which provided that customers would make a series of installment payments. Walker would retain title to the items until all payments were made, at which time title would pass to the customer. All Walker’s lease agreements also contained a unique provision that every time a new item was leased by a customer, a balance would become due on all items previously leased by that customer until the entire balance for all items was liquidated. The effect of this provision was that if a customer defaulted on his most recent purchase, Walker could attempt to repossess all previous purchases by that customer. Williams (defendant) purchased a stereo from Walker and defaulted shortly thereafter. Walker brought suit to recover on the stereo as well as all other items previously purchased by Williams. The trial court granted judgment for Walker, and the appellate court affirmed. Williams and other defendants appealed to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Skelly Wright, C.J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Dissent (Danaher, C.J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 170,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.