Worthen Bank & Trust Co., N.A. v. Hilyard Drilling Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
840 F.2d 596 (1988)
Hilyard Drilling Company (Hilyard) (defendant) granted a security interest in all of its accounts receivable and the resulting proceeds to the National Bank of Commerce of El Dorado (NBC) (defendant). NBC perfected the security interest by filing a financing statement on April 26, 1979, which had an expiration date of April 25, 1984. Thereafter, Worthen Bank & Trust Company (Worthen) (plaintiff) approved a loan to Hilyard in exchange for a lien on Hilyard’s accounts receivable. In a letter referencing the transaction, Worthen acknowledged that NBC had a first lien on the accounts. Worthen also agreed to confirm in writing, if requested, that NBC’s lien took priority. However, NBC never requested the offered acknowledgment. Worthen perfected its security interest on June 14, 1983, by filing financing statements. These statements did not acknowledge that Worthen’s interest was second to NBC’s interest. On July 8, 1983, NBC restructured Hilyard’s loans and filed a second financing statement in connection with NBC’s interest in Hilyard’s accounts. However, NBC did not file a continuation statement within six months before the expiration date of its initial 1979 financing statement, and NBC’s second filing statement did not reference the initial statement. Hilyard filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on January 25, 1985. At the time, the amount that Hilyard owed to NBC and Worthen was larger than Hilyard’s accounts receivable. Worthen filed a motion requesting a determination of the priority of the security interests in Hilyard’s accounts. The bankruptcy court concluded that Worthen’s interest took priority over NBC’s interest. The district court affirmed. NBC appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Wollman, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.