Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Wratchford v. S.J. Groves & Sons Co.

405 F.2d 1061 (1969)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...

Wratchford v. S.J. Groves & Sons Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

405 F.2d 1061 (1969)

Facts

Richard P. Wratchford was found with a fractured skull at the bottom of a highway drainage hole in Maryland. Richard had suffered severe brain damage. The highway where Richard was found was undergoing construction work at the time of the accident, and the hole that Richard was found in did not have a grate over its opening. Treva M. Wratchford (plaintiff), Richard’s wife, filed a lawsuit in federal district court based on diversity jurisdiction against S. J. Groves & Sons Co., the general contractor for the construction, and Dale W. Miller, the worker who constructed the drain opening (collectively, the contractors) (defendants). At trial, Treva argued that Richard fell through the drain opening because the contractors negligently failed to place a grate over the opening. The contractors argued that Richard may have slipped or crawled into the hole after falling on ice, meaning that the absence of a grate on top of the drain opening did not cause Richard’s injuries. The district court applied Maryland’s standards for determining whether evidence was sufficient to go to a jury and found that the theories proposed by Treva and the contractors were equally likely. Because it was not clear that the contractors were the proximate cause of Richard’s injuries, the district court held that evidence of the contractors’ negligence was not sufficient to go to a jury. Treva argued that the federal standard for determining whether the evidence was sufficient to go to a jury should have been applied. Under the federal standard, a court allows evidence to go to a jury if the jury might reasonably conclude that the defendants proximately caused the plaintiff’s injury. The district court entered a directed verdict for the contractors. Treva appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Haynsworth, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 617,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 617,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 617,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 35,400 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership