Yates v. United States
United States Supreme Court
574 U.S. 528, 135 S.Ct. 107, 191 L.Ed.2d 64 (2015)
- Written by Eric Cervone, LLM
Facts
John Yates (defendant), a commercial fisherman, caught undersized red grouper in federal waters in the Gulf of Mexico in violation of federal conservation regulations. To prevent federal authorities from confirming that he had caught the fish, Yates ordered a crew member to toss the fish back into the water. As a result, Yates was charged with violating a provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Act), 18 U.S.C. § 1519, which criminalized the destruction or concealment of any record, document, or tangible object to obstruct a federal investigation. At trial, Yates argued that § 1519 did not apply to throwing fish overboard in a commercial-fishing context. The government disagreed and claimed that fish were a tangible object within the purview of § 1519. Yates was convicted and sentenced to 30 days of imprisonment. Yates appealed. The court of appeals affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ginsburg, J.)
Concurrence (Alito, J.)
Dissent (Kagan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
