Court of Appeals of Michigan
506 N.W.2d 556 (1993)
General Motors (GM) (defendant) ran a manufacturing plant in the town of Ypsilanti (plaintiff), called the Willow Run plant. GM sought a tax abatement from Ypsilanti in order to make improvements at the plant. Ypsilanti granted two tax abatements under Michigan statutes providing for them. At a public meeting regarding the abatements, GM’s plant manager stated that the completed project would allow Willow Run to continue production and that continuous employment could be maintained. GM later decided to move its manufacturing from the Willow Run plant to another location outside of Ypsilanti. Ypsilanti brought suit alleging breach of contract, promissory estoppel, unjust enrichment, and misrepresentation. The trial held that no contract was formed, but held in Ypsilanti’s favor under the theory of promissory estoppel. GM appealed to the Court of Appeals of Michigan.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Per Curiam)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 240,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.