Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Dolan v. City of Tigard

United States Supreme Court
512 U.S. 374 (1994)

Dolan v. City of Tigard

Facts

Dolan (plaintiff) owned a property located adjacent to and partially on a creek’s 100-year floodplain. She operated a store on part of the property and she wished to redevelop the store, doubling its size and paving her gravel parking lot. In doing so, she would increase the impervious surface on the property and, as a result, storm water runoff. The City of Tigard (defendant) granted her a permit to complete the redevelopment, subject to conditions that required Dolan to (1) dedicate the portion of the property within the floodplain to a recreational public greenway designed to minimize flood damage and (2) dedicate a segment adjacent to the floodplain to the development of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway in order to reduce traffic congestion in town that may have been caused by her larger store. Dolan appealed the city’s decision to the Land Use Board of Appeals, which affirmed the decision. The Oregon Court of Appeals also affirmed the decision, as did the Oregon Supreme Court. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Stevens, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Souter, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 219,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.