From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...
Hydraform Products Corp. v. American Steel & Aluminum Corp.
New Hampshire Supreme Court
498 A.2d 339 (1985)
Hydraform Products Corp. (Hydraform) (plaintiff) manufactures steel woodstoves. In July 1978, Hydraform contracted to purchase a “trial order” of sufficient steel to make 40 stoves from American Steel & Aluminum Corp. (American) (defendant). American prepared a delivery receipt that limited American’s liability for any consequential damages suffered by Hydraform in connection with American’s steel. Hydraform’s agents signed the delivery receipt for each delivery from American. Hydraform later entered a contract to purchase steel from American for 400 stoves. American required Hydraform’s agents to sign the same delivery receipt limiting American’s liability for consequential damages. American eventually began making late deliveries of steel to Hydraform. Other deliveries from American were defective. As a result of American’s late and defective deliveries, Hydraform only sold 250 of its planned 400 stoves. In September 1979, Hydraform sold its woodstove manufacturing division for $150,000 plus royalties, a price Hydraform’s president believed to be significantly below the actual value of the business. In December 1979, Hydraform brought suit in New Hampshire state court against American seeking consequential damages for lost profits due to American’s breach of contract. At trial, the jury was permitted to consider Hydraform’s damages based on its loss profits under its contract with American (150 stoves), its future lost profits for two years, and the lost profits caused by Hydraform’s selling of its woodstoves business at a price below what its president believed the business to be worth. The trial court also held that American’s delivery receipt limiting liability did not prevent Hydraform from recovering consequential damages from American. The jury awarded Hydraform $80,245.12 in damages, and American appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Souter, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 219,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.