Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Marina District Development Co., LLC v. Ivey

United States District Court for the District of New Jersey
2016 WL 6138239 (Oct. 21, 2016)


Facts

Phillip Ivey and Cheng Yin Sun (defendants) requested specific accommodations to play baccarat at the Borgata Hotel Casino & Spa (Borgata) (plaintiff). The accommodations included a private table and dealer, as well as a specific type of playing cards. Ivey and Sun claimed that they needed the accommodations because they were superstitious. The playing cards were manufactured so that the design on the back of the cards was not identical on each edge of the card. In other words, the cards were cut so the design was cut off at different points on each edge. Ivey and Sun used this design to remember which cards were helpful to them in the game and which cards were unhelpful. Ivey and Sun asked the dealer to turn good cards in a certain way and turn bad cards in the opposite way. The dealer again thought that this was merely due to superstition. The process, called “edge sorting,” substantially increased Ivey and Sun’s odds of winning. The Borgata brought suit against Ivey and Sun for breach of contract, alleging that they impliedly agreed to gamble at the Borgata pursuant to the New Jersey Casino Control Act (CCA). The CCA prohibited playing baccarat with marked cards. The Borgata also filed a claim for fraud, alleging that Ivey and Sun materially misrepresented their requests as superstition, as opposed to their true purpose of card marking. Both parties moved for summary judgment.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Hillman, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.