181 East 73rd Street Co. v. 181 East 73rd Tenants Corp.

954 F.2d 45 (1992)

From our private database of 46,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

181 East 73rd Street Co. v. 181 East 73rd Tenants Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
954 F.2d 45 (1992)

LJ

Facts

A building located at 181 East 73rd Street in Manhattan, New York, was converted from rental to cooperative ownership. The building contained residential units and a commercial area that included a parking garage. The conversion’s sponsor was 181 East 73rd Street Corporation (the sponsor) (plaintiff), and the new owner was 181 East 73rd Tenants Corporation (the tenants corporation) (defendant). During the conversion, the tenants corporation executed a 99-year master lease devising the commercial portion to the sponsor. At the time, the tenants corporation was controlled by the sponsor. However, in June 1985, the tenants corporation replaced the sponsor and elected a new board of directors. Shortly thereafter, asbestos was discovered in the building, including the garage. The sponsor and the tenants corporation entered into an agreement for asbestos abatement and confirmed the remainder of the master lease. The asbestos agreement did not go before the cooperative membership for a vote. Shortly thereafter, a two-thirds vote of the membership of the tenants corporation terminated the master lease for the parking garage. The sponsor filed a declaratory action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging that the tenants corporation had waived its termination rights by ratifying the master lease through the asbestos agreement. The tenants corporation filed a counterclaim, seeking a declaratory judgment regarding the master lease’s validity and unconscionability. The district court found that the termination of the master lease was valid, but that the lease was not unconscionable. The sponsor filed an appeal.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Oakes, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 744,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,000 briefs, keyed to 986 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,000 briefs - keyed to 986 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership