A. Ahlstrom Osakeyhtio et al. v. Commission of the European Communities (Re Wood Pulp Cartel) (Wood Pulp II)

1988 E.C.R. I-05193 (1988)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

A. Ahlstrom Osakeyhtio et al. v. Commission of the European Communities (Re Wood Pulp Cartel) (Wood Pulp II)

European Union Court of Justice
1988 E.C.R. I-05193 (1988)

Facts

The Commission of European Communities (the Commission) (defendant) found that a group of wood-pulp producers including A. Ahlstrom Osakeyhtio (collectively, the pulp producers) (plaintiffs) infringed Article 85 of a treaty governing competition in the common market of the European Community. [Editor's Note: The European Community was later incorporated into the European Union, and Article 85 became Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.] All the involved pulp producers had registered offices that were outside the European Community. The Commission found that the pulp producers engaged in concerted pricing decisions that were announced quarterly in the European Community and that were implemented in transactions occurring with customers in the European Community. The pulp producers filed a challenge to the Commission’s decision in the European Union Court of Justice, arguing that the Commission had no jurisdiction over the matter because the involved pulp producers were not European and had not reached any agreement to set prices in Europe.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 829,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 829,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 829,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership