From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.
Acara v. Banks
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
470 F.3d 569 (2006)
- Written by Miller Jozwiak, JD
Facts
Dr. Bradley Banks (defendant) allegedly disclosed the medical information of Margaret Acara (plaintiff). Banks allegedly did so during a deposition without Acara’s consent. In response, Acara sued Banks for violating the Heath Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA). This was Acara’s only claim. Banks claimed that the district court did not have subject-matter jurisdiction because HIPAA, which did not have an express cause of action, authorized no private cause of action. The district court agreed, concluding that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction. Acara appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
