Ackerman v. Sobol Family Partnership, LLP

4 A.3d 288 (2010)

From our private database of 47,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Ackerman v. Sobol Family Partnership, LLP

Connecticut Supreme Court
4 A.3d 288 (2010)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD
Play video

Facts

Rena Sobol Ackerman and others (collectively, the Ackermans) (plaintiffs) sued the Sobol Family Partnership and others (collectively, the partnership) (defendants) for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and other claims. The parties engaged in mediation and settlement negotiations, with attorney Glenn Coe as the Ackermans' representative. During the negotiations, Coe rejected settlement offers, made counteroffers, and had several conversations with the partnership’s attorneys on the Ackermans' behalf. Coe also repeatedly assured the partnership’s attorneys that he possessed settlement authority, and the Ackermans never indicated that Coe lacked such authority. Coe ultimately made a global settlement offer to settle all the lawsuits at once, and the partnership accepted. The partnership moved to enforce the settlement agreement. The Ackermans objected, claiming that they had never granted Coe settlement authority. But the trial court granted the motion, finding that the Ackermans had granted Coe the apparent authority to enter a settlement agreement on their behalf. The Connecticut Appellate Court affirmed, and the Connecticut Supreme Court granted review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Zarella, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 924,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 924,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,300 briefs, keyed to 1,000 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 924,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,300 briefs - keyed to 1,000 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Understand your casebook readings in seconds

Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.

Get instant access to over 47,300+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,000 law school casebooks.

Case book preview