Acosta v. Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
717 F.2d 828 (1983)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
Wilfredo Acosta (plaintiff) suffered injuries after the rear wheel of his used motorcycle hit a ditch and collapsed. Acosta brought suit against the motorcycle’s manufacturers, including Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (Honda) (defendant), on claims of negligence and strict products liability. The evidence did not show any previous complaints or lawsuits by consumers with respect to the wheel on the model of motorcycle driven by Acosta. The jury delivered a verdict for Acosta on the strict-liability claim and assessed punitive damages against Honda. Honda appealed, arguing that punitive damages were not applicable. The United States Court of Appeals granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Becker, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.