Action Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Simon Wrecking Co.

428 F. Supp. 2d 288 (2006)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Action Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Simon Wrecking Co.

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
428 F. Supp. 2d 288 (2006)

Facts

Chemclene Corporation processed and stored industrial solvents and waste at the Malvern TCE Superfund Site in Malvern, Pennsylvania, for 40 years. The site was eventually targeted by the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Superfund program for cleaning up hazardous locations, and the EPA notified certain parties that they were potentially responsible parties (PRPs) under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). Simon Wrecking Co. (defendant) was one of those PRPs, because the company brought drums of hazardous wastes to the site during its operation. The Chemclene Site Defense Group (CSDG) (plaintiffs) entered into a consent decree with the EPA and agreed to take responsibility for remediating the site. The CSDG filed a lawsuit under CERCLA against 74 PRPs to collect their shares of the cleanup costs. At the time of trial, CSDG had received approximately $6.6 million in settlements from PRPs, and the total cleanup costs were estimated to be approximately $23 million. The only defendant that did not settle prior to trial was Simon Wrecking Co.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Brody, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership