Adalah Legal Centre for Arab Minority Rights in Israel v. Minister of Defense
Israel Supreme Court
HCJ 8276/05 (2006)

- Written by Whitney Waldenberg, JD
Facts
Israel’s civil tort law recognized that Israel can be held liable for torts unless there is an express exception set forth by statute. One exception is torts related to combatant activity of the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF). The IDF conducted roadblocks and searches in the West Bank and, prior to 2005, in Gaza. The Israel Supreme Court had previously ruled that such activity did not constitute combatant activities. The Israeli Knesset responded to the ruling by adding Amendment 7 to the exception, with broadened state immunity to include any activity by the IDF in a conflict zone. Adalah Legal Centre (plaintiff) filed a petition against the Israeli minister of defense (defendant), claiming that Amendment 7 violated the basic law guaranteeing the rights of human dignity and liberty.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Barak, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 826,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 991 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.