Court of Appeals of New York
92 N.E. 670 (1910)
Gillig (defendant) sought to purchase from Adams (plaintiff) a portion of one of Adams’ three adjoining lots of real property for “residential purposes.” Gillig informed Adams’ agents that he intended to build dwellings on the land. Adams relied on Gilligs’ statements when the sale was commenced. After the sale of the property, however, Gillig constructed a public parking garage, something Gillig had planned to do and concealed from Adams. Thereafter, Adams offered to find another site for Gillig’s parking garage if Gillig would reconvey the land back to Adams. Gillig refused. Adams brought suit against Gillig for misrepresentation. The trial judge found for Adams and ordered a reconveyance of the subject property. The appellate court affirmed and Gillig appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Chase, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 241,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.