Adams v. Howerton
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
673 F.2d 1036 (1982)
Adams (plaintiff) married Sullivan after Sullivan’s visitor’s visa expired. Adams and Sullivan are both men. They were married by a minister and received a marriage license from a county clerk in Colorado. Adams then petitioned the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) to classify Sullivan as his spouse, which would make Sullivan eligible to permanently live in the United States based on his status as an immediate relative of an American citizen. The INS denied the petition. The Board of Immigration Appeals affirmed the denial, as did the district court. Adams then appealed to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Wallace, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 171,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.