Oregon Supreme Court
273 P.2d 460 (1975)
In 1965, Margaret Adamson (plaintiff) and Brian Adamson, as husband and wife, and Brian’s mother Inez Adamson (defendant) were the named buyers of a house. In June 1972, Margaret and Brian transferred their interest as husband and wife to Brian’s father Joel Adamson (defendant). A few months later, Margaret petitioned for divorce, and in October 1973, Inez transferred her interest to Joel. The divorce decree awarded Margaret all of Brian’s interest in the subject property. This suit was initiated to review the equitable distribution of the property as between Margaret and Joel. The trial court first held that the 1972 conveyance to Joel was void because it was obtained through duress and coercion. The trial court ruled that Margaret owned two-thirds and Joel owned one-third of the equitable interest and ordered accounting and sale of the parties' interests. Joel appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Bryson, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 237,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.