Adamson v. Adamson

541 P.2d 460 (1975)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Adamson v. Adamson

Oregon Supreme Court
541 P.2d 460 (1975)

Play video

Facts

In 1965, Margaret Adamson (plaintiff) and Brian Adamson, as husband and wife, and Brian’s mother Inez Adamson (defendant) were the named buyers of a house. In June 1972, Margaret and Brian transferred their interest as husband and wife to Brian’s father Joel Adamson (defendant). A few months later, Margaret petitioned for divorce, and in October 1973, Inez transferred her interest to Joel. The divorce decree awarded Margaret all of Brian’s interest in the subject property. This suit was initiated to review the equitable distribution of the property as between Margaret and Joel. The trial court first held that the 1972 conveyance to Joel was void because it was obtained through duress and coercion. The trial court ruled that Margaret owned two-thirds and Joel owned one-third of the equitable interest and ordered accounting and sale of the parties' interests. Joel appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bryson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 788,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership