Adobe Whitewater Club of New Mexico v. New Mexico State Game Commission
New Mexico Supreme Court
519 P.3d 46 (2022)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
The New Mexico Constitution provided that the state’s natural waters, such as rivers and lakes, belonged to the public. A private landowner could own the banks next to and the bed under natural public waters but could not own the water itself. It was well-established that this arrangement meant that the public had a right to float on public waters, even if the water flowed on top of private land. However, the New Mexico State Game Commission (commission) (defendant) enacted regulations that allowed a private landowner to exclude the public from actually touching the private bed under the water, such as by walking or wading on private land under a public river. The Adobe Whitewater Club of New Mexico and two other nonprofit organizations (the recreational organizations) (plaintiffs) filed a petition with the New Mexico Supreme Court seeking a writ of prohibitory mandamus to void the regulations as unconstitutional. The recreational organizations argued that the regulations effectively prevented their members from being able to fish and recreate on many public waters, which meant that the regulations violated their members’ state constitutional right to use public waters. The New Mexico Supreme Court agreed that the regulations violated the state constitution and issued a writ preventing the commission from enforcing the regulations. The court then published an opinion explaining its reasoning.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Vigil, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 921,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,300 briefs, keyed to 1,000 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.


