Advanced Manufacturing Technologies, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc.

2002 WL 1446953 (2002)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Advanced Manufacturing Technologies, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc.

United States District Court for the District of Arizona
2002 WL 1446953 (2002)

SC

Facts

Advanced Manufacturing Technologies, Inc. (ATM) (plaintiff) sued Motorola, Inc. (defendant). Douglas Irish and his law firm represented Motorola in the litigation, which had been going on for three years. Merlin Dean Corley was a former Motorola employee and a material witness in the case. In preparing for his deposition, Corley communicated regularly with Irish. Irish also appeared at the deposition, where Corley testified that he was represented by Irish. Irish did not say anything in response to this testimony. Ultimately, it became clear that Corley’s interests were averse to Motorola in the matter. At that point, Corley filed a motion to disqualify Irish and his law firm from representing Motorola due to their prior communications.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Anderson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 834,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership