Aguilar v. RP MRP Washington Harbour, LLC
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
98 A.3d 979 (2014)
RP MRP Washington Harbour, LLC (defendant) owned a retail complex on the Potomac River. The river rose, and the complex flooded, forcing most businesses to close temporarily. The complex had disappearing flood walls, but RP MRP did not raise the walls despite a flood warning from the National Weather Service. Aguilar and other employees (plaintiffs) of the retail complex businesses brought a negligence suit against RP MRP in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. Aguilar claimed that due to the closures, the plaintiffs lost wages. RP MRP filed a motion to dismiss, and the superior court granted the motion. Aguilar appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Blackburne-Rigsby, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.