Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Ahern v. Scholz

85 F.3d 774 (1996)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 35,600+ case briefs...

Ahern v. Scholz

United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

85 F.3d 774 (1996)

Play video

Facts

Paul Ahern (plaintiff) was the manager of Donald Thomas Scholz (defendant), a member of the band Boston. The two entered into various agreements, including a further modification agreement (FMA), which required Scholz to pay Ahern royalties from Boston’s third album and required Ahern to pay Scholz royalties from Boston’s first and second albums. Ahern brought suit for breach of the FMA against Scholz for failure to pay those royalties and Scholz counterclaimed that Ahern breached the FMA by not paying his respective royalties. Ahern sought over a million dollars from Scholz and an accountant estimated that Ahern owed Scholz $459,000. The trial jury found that Scholz breached the FMA and that Ahern did not materially breach the FMA. It awarded Ahern $547,007 in damages. The district court denied Scholz’s motion for a new trial. Scholz appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Torruella, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 618,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 618,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 618,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 35,600 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership