Aikens v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co.
Pennsylvania Superior Court
348 Pa. Super. 17, 501 A.2d 277 (1985)
- Written by Tammy Boggs, JD
Facts
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. (B&O Railroad) (defendant) operated a train that derailed and damaged a plant operated by Motor Coils Manufacturing Company, Inc. (Motor Coils). The plant damage negatively impacted production for a while, causing employees to lose work and wages. Albert Aikens and employees of Motor Coils (the employees) (plaintiffs) sued B&O Railroad alleging that the railroad’s negligence caused the train derailment, the production curtailment, and the employees’ loss of wages. The employees did not suffer any personal injury or property damage. The trial court entered an order granting B&O Railroad’s motion for judgment on the pleadings on the ground that the employees had not stated a cause of action. On appeal, the employees argued that there should be a cause of action allowing them to be compensated for purely economic losses.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Olszewski, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.