Ailiff v. Mar-Bal, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Ohio
575 N.E.2d 228 (1990)
- Written by Nicholas Decoster, JD
Facts
Mar-Bal, Inc. (Mar-Bal) (defendant) was a plastics manufacturer. As part of its operation, Mar-Bal had employees that used methylene chloride (solvent) to clean Mar-Bal’s equipment at its plant. The solvent caused various health problems when inhaled or absorbed through the skin at high doses, and Mar-Bal was aware that certain safety precautions needed to be taken in order to ensure its employees were safe from exposure. Nevertheless, Mar-Bal had its employees use the solvent without the proper protective equipment and even had employees wash their hands using the solvent. After suffering health problems, a group of employees who were members of the Ailiff family (solvent employees) (plaintiffs) brought an intentional-tort action against Mar-Bal. At trial, a motion for a directed verdict was granted in favor of Mar-Bal. The solvent employees appealed the decision.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ford, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.