From our private database of 28,500+ case briefs...
Airadigm Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission (In re Airadigm Communications, Inc.)
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
519 F.3d 640 (2008)
Airadigm Communications, Inc. (Airadigm) (plaintiff) obtained 15 licenses for personal communications services from the Federal Communications Commission (the FCC) (defendant). Airadigm agreed to pay off the licenses on an installment plan. Later, Airadigm filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. The FCC canceled Airadigm’s licenses and filed a proof of claim for the remaining amounts owed. The plan of reorganization hinged on financing from a third party, Telephone and Data Systems (TDS). After the bankruptcy, Airadigm sought to have the licenses reinstated. Following a recent court ruling on a case with similar circumstances, the FCC decided that its cancellation of Airadigm’s licenses had been ineffective. Airadigm filed a second Chapter 11 petition, and the bankruptcy court approved a second plan of reorganization. The plan included a release from liability of TDS for all claims arising in connection with the plan, with the exception of willful misconduct. The bankruptcy court considered the release a vital factor in inducing TDS’s participation in the plan. Airadigm commenced an adversary proceeding against the FCC, seeking to eliminate the FCC’s interest in the licenses, which had carried over from the original plan. The FCC objected to the release from liability of TDS, arguing that such a release was not permissible under the Bankruptcy Code. The matter was appealed to federal district court, which affirmed the bankruptcy court in all relevant respects. Both parties appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Flaum, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 545,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 545,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.