Airline Pilots Association, International, AFL-CIO v. TACA International Airlines

748 F.2d 965 (1984)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Airline Pilots Association, International, AFL-CIO v. TACA International Airlines

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
748 F.2d 965 (1984)

Facts

TACA International Airlines, S.A. (TACA) (defendant) was a Salvadoran airline that conducted some operations in the United States and maintained its pilot base in New Orleans. TACA had a collective-bargaining agreement with its pilots, who were all members of the Airline Pilots Association, International, AFL-CIO (association) (plaintiff). In 1982, the United States and El Salvador signed an agreement agreeing to comply with the air-transportation labor laws of each country while operating in that country. The following year, the Salvadoran constitution was amended to require all Salvadoran public-service companies, including airlines, to locate their base of operations in El Salvador. The government of El Salvador also specifically ordered TACA to move its pilot base to El Salvador. TACA immediately notified its pilots that it was moving its base, that the association would no longer be able to represent the pilots, and that the pilots could either accept the new situation or be terminated. The association sued TACA to enjoin the changes. The district court found that TACA’s proposed actions would violate the Railway Labor Act and entered an order temporarily preventing TACA from making the changes. TACA appealed the order, and the government of El Salvador filed an amicus curiae brief in support of the appeal. TACA did not dispute that its proposed changes would violate the act. Instead, TACA argued that the act-of-state doctrine and the foreign-compulsion defense allowed it to comply with the Salvadoran constitutional requirement even if it meant violating the act.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Politz, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 804,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership