Alcorn v. Mitchell
Illinois Supreme Court
63 Ill. 553 (1872)
- Written by Megan Petersen, JD
Facts
William Alcorn (defendant) was a wealthy man. At the end of a trespass action between Alcorn and Andrew Mitchell (plaintiff), Alcorn deliberately spat in Mitchell’s face in the presence of others in the courtroom. Mitchell sued Alcorn for offensive battery. The jury awarded punitive damages totaling $1,000. Alcorn appealed to the Illinois Supreme Court, arguing that the damages were excessive.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Sheldon, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.