Alderman v. United States
United States Supreme Court
394 U.S. 165 (1968)
- Written by Ariella Zarfati, JD
Facts
Alderman (defendant) and others were prosecuted for various crimes using evidence obtained through allegedly unlawful wiretapping. The United States (plaintiff) conceded that one of the challenged acts of wiretapping was illegal. The United States argued that the defendants lacked standing to demand exclusion of the wiretap evidence.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.