Alleman v. Omni Energy Services Corp.

580 F.3d 280, 2009 AMC 1817 (2009)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Alleman v. Omni Energy Services Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
580 F.3d 280, 2009 AMC 1817 (2009)

Facts

W & T Offshore, Inc. (W & T) operated oil platforms off the coast of Louisiana in the Gulf of Mexico. W & T contracted with Omni Energy Services Corp. (Omni) (defendant) to have Omni fly W & T employees to the platforms in helicopters. An Omni helicopter carrying W & T employees to one of the platforms was involved in an accident. The passengers involved in the helicopter accident (the passengers) (plaintiffs) sued Omni. Omni sought indemnity from W & T based on their contract for the helicopter services Omni provided, which had a mutual-indemnity clause. Omni argued that the contract fell under admiralty jurisdiction and that the indemnity clause was therefore valid. W & T alleged that the contract was not a maritime contract and therefore was subject not to admiralty law, but rather to state law, which would render the indemnity clause void and unenforceable. The district court held that the contract was not a maritime contract and not subject to admiralty jurisdiction and granted partial summary judgment to W & T. Omni appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Clement, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership