Allen Archery, Inc. v. Browning Manufacturing Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
819 F.2d 1087, 2 U.S.P.Q.2d 1490 (1987)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
Allen Archery, Inc. (Allen) (plaintiff) brought a patent-infringement action against Browning Manufacturing Company (Browning) (defendant) in federal district court. Before initiating the suit, Allen voluntarily filed disclaimers of three of the patent’s claims, which Allen’s counsel had deemed invalid. Before the case went to trial, Allen’s counsel disclaimed several more claims found invalid by a court in a different infringement action. Following trial, the district court found that other claims in Allen’s patent were valid and infringed by Browning. Browning appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, contending that Allen was barred from recovery because Allen had failed to disclaim the additional invalid claims at the same time it disclaimed the initial three claims.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Friedman, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.