Allianz SpA and Generali Assicurazioni Generali SpA v. West Tankers Inc.

Case C-185/07, 2009 E.C.R. I-00663 (2009)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Allianz SpA and Generali Assicurazioni Generali SpA v. West Tankers Inc.

European Union Court of Justice
Case C-185/07, 2009 E.C.R. I-00663 (2009)

Facts

Erg Petroli SpA (Erg) chartered a ship owned by West Tankers, Inc. (defendant), which hit and damaged a jetty owned by Erg. The charter-party agreement between Erg and West Tankers included an arbitration clause stating disputes would be resolved by arbitration in London under English law. Insurance companies Allianz SpA and Generali Assicurazioni Generali SpA (the insurers) (plaintiffs) compensated Erg for some of the damage, and Erg began arbitration proceedings against West Tanker for the remainder. The insurers filed an action against West Tankers at the Tribunale di Siracusa in Italy under Italian subrogation law, seeking payment to compensate for their payouts to Erg. West Tankers argued that the Italian court lacked jurisdiction over the dispute because of the arbitration clause. West Tankers initiated parallel proceedings in the England and Wales High Court of Justice. West Tankers requested a judicial order declaring that the insurance dispute could be resolved only in arbitration and an antisuit injunction prohibiting the insurers from pursuing the Italian action or initiating other judicial proceedings related to the dispute. The High Court found in favor of West Tankers and issued the antisuit injunction against the insurers. The insurers appealed to the House of Lords, arguing that the antisuit injunction violated the Brussels I Regulation (the regulation). The House of Lords stayed the proceedings to refer a question about the compatibility of antisuit injunctions with the regulation to the European Union Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 788,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership