Allied Local and Regional Manufacturers Caucus v. EPA

215 F.3d 61 (2000)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 36,900+ case briefs...

Allied Local and Regional Manufacturers Caucus v. EPA

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

215 F.3d 61 (2000)

Facts

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (defendant) set national air-quality standards for ozone under the Clean Air Act. Ozone, a pollutant that poses hazards to human health and the environment, forms if nitrous oxides react with volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Section 183(e) of the Clean Air Act required the EPA to analyze VOC emissions from various consumer and commercial products and to regulate the products that accounted for the most VOC emissions. The EPA conducted a study and proposed rules limiting VOC emissions from architectural coatings, automobile coatings, and certain consumer products. During the public comment period, the EPA responded to concerns. Before finalizing the rules, the EPA considered alternatives to the VOC emissions limits. Allied Local and Regional Manufacturers Caucus (Allied) (plaintiff) challenged the EPA’s rule as a violation of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, which requires agencies to conduct a regulatory-flexibility analysis on a proposed rule to determine the rule’s potential impact on small businesses.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Garland, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 629,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 629,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 36,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 629,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 36,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership