Almog v. Arab Bank
United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York
471 F. Supp. 2d 257 (2007)
- Written by Samantha Arena, JD
Facts
The Islamic Resistance Movement (HAMAS), Palestinian Jihad (PIJ), Al Aqsa Martyrs' Brigade (AAMB), and Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) (organizations), conducted suicide bombings targeting Israeli citizens and injuring more than 1,600 United States and foreign nationals (victims) (plaintiffs). The victims brought suit under the Alien Tort Statute (ATS), 28 U.S.C. § 1350 (2006), against Arab Bank (defendant), a bank operating within the Palestinian territories. The victims claimed the bank financed the bombings and other activities. The victims argued the bank was liable under the ATS for violations of the law of nations, including genocide, crimes against humanity, and the financing of attacks on civilians. The bank moved to dismiss the complaints, contending that the victims failed to state a claim because the alleged conduct, commonly referred to as "terrorism," did not constitute a violation of the law of nations because there was no international, widely agreed upon meaning of the term "terrorism."
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gershon, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.