Alteiri v. Colasso
Connecticut Supreme Court
362 A.2d 798 (1975)
John Colasso (defendant) threw a rock that hit Richard Alteiri (plaintiff) in the eye, causing damage. Alteiri brought suit against Colasso for battery. The jury was asked a series of special interrogatories and returned the following findings: Colasso threw the rock with the intent of scaring someone other than Alteiri, and, in throwing the rock, Colasso did not intend to hit or harm anyone, including the person he was intending to scare. Based on these findings, the trial court entered a judgment for Alteiri. Colasso filed a motion to set aside the verdict and a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, each of which the trial court denied. Colasso appealed, arguing that he could not be guilty of battery, because he did not intend to scare or harm Alteiri.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Loiselle, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 705,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 705,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,300 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.