Aluminum Co. of America v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Washington Supreme Court
998 P.2d 856 (2000)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
The Aluminum Company of America (Alcoa) (plaintiff) obtained an Aetna Casualty & Surety Company (Aetna) (defendant) insurance policy that indemnified Alcoa for damage to its numerous properties scattered throughout the country. Alcoa knew at the time that many of those sites were polluted, but it did not share that knowledge with Aetna because Alcoa had no plans or legal obligations to address the pollution and no intention to file pollution-related insurance claims. In 1980, however, Congress enacted legislation that imposed retroactive liability on polluters for past environmental damage. The legislation forced Alcoa to clean up its properties. When Alcoa’s insurers refused to honor Alcoa’s claims for cleanup-cost reimbursements, Alcoa took Aetna to court in the state of Washington. Pennsylvania law applied to the case. Aetna claimed that Alcoa’s earlier failure to disclose the polluted condition of its property constituted a material misrepresentation that avoided Aetna’s policy. Under questioning at trial, Aetna executives testified that they never believed that the policy covered environmental damage. The jury entered its verdict for Alcoa, and the trial court denied Aetna’s motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Aetna appealed to the Washington Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Talmadge, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
