From our private database of 37,200+ case briefs...
Ambler Realty Co. v. Village of Euclid, Ohio
United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
297 F. 307 (1924)
Facts
The Village of Euclid (Euclid) (defendant) adopted an ordinance establishing a comprehensive zoning plan (the ordinance). The ordinance divided the area of Euclid into six classes of use districts, U-1 to U-6. Use restrictions were cumulative, meaning that permitted uses in the U-2 district included those permitted in the U-1 district, and so on. U-1, the most restricted district, was limited to single-family homes. The U-2 district permitted two-family dwellings, and the U-3 district permitted multi-family housing. U-6, the least restricted district, included industrial and manufacturing activities. Ambler Realty Company (Ambler) (plaintiff) owned 68 acres of vacant land in Euclid. Ambler sought to sell and develop the land for industrial purposes, but portions of the land were zoned so as to prohibit industrial use. Ambler brought suit against Euclid, contending that the ordinance resulted in an unconstitutional taking of private property without compensation.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Westenhaver, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 630,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,200 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.