American Honda Motor Co., Inc. v. Allen
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
600 F.3d 813 (2010)

- Written by Mary Phelan D'Isa, JD
Facts
American Honda Motor Co. and Honda of America Manufacturing (Honda) (defendants) appealed a federal district court’s decision to give Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3) certification to a class of Honda’s Gold Wing GL1800 motorcycle purchasers (plaintiffs) in their action against Honda for an alleged design defect. Honda contested the district court’s acceptance-with-reservation of the class of purchasers’ expert’s report regarding a wobble-decay standard. Honda alleged that the evidence was unreliable under the Daubert Standard, which requires that proffered scientific expert testimony be relevant and reliable. Despite the district court’s reservations about the reliability of the evidence, it declined to exclude it in its entirety at the class-certification stage of the litigation.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.