Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

American Insurance Association v. Clarke

865 F.2d 278 (1989)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...

American Insurance Association v. Clarke

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

865 F.2d 278 (1989)

Facts

Under the National Bank Act, subsidiaries of national banks were subject to the same restrictions as national banks. Citibank, N.A. was a national bank. Citibank sought to establish a subsidiary for the purpose of offering municipal-bond insurance. Citibank submitted a proposal to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency to form the American Municipal Bond Assurance Corporation (AMBAC) for offering of such insurance. Under the proposal, if a municipality wanted to issue municipal bonds, it would apply to AMBAC for insurance. AMBAC would then analyze the municipality’s creditworthiness. If the municipality had adequate credit, AMBAC would offer municipal-bond insurance in the form of a standby credit. In the event of a default by the bond issuer (i.e., the municipality), AMBAC would pay money owed to bondholders upon the presentation of documentary proof of nonpayment. Any insurance was to be for a definite term and limited in amount. The comptroller of the currency, Robert Clarke (defendant) approved Citibank’s proposal because it was sufficiently similar to other credit services normally offered by national banks. Specifically, the comptroller found that Citibank’s proposal was functionally equivalent to a standby letter of credit. The American Insurance Association (plaintiff) was a property-and-casualty-insurance trade group. The American Insurance Association sued the comptroller, seeking that the comptroller’s order approving AMBAC’s municipal-bond-insurance program be set aside. The district court found that the comptroller’s order did not violate the National Bank Act. The American Insurance Association appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Buckley, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 607,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 607,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 607,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 33,800 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership