American Paper Institute v. Environmental Protection Agency

660 F.2d 954 (1981)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

American Paper Institute v. Environmental Protection Agency

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
660 F.2d 954 (1981)

Facts

American Paper Institute (API) (plaintiff) sought judicial review of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) (defendant) actions in issuing regulations under section 304(b)(4)(B) of the Clean Water Act (Act). API challenged the best conventional technology (BCT) regulations issued according to Section 304(b)(4)(B). API’s primary challenge was the EPA’s methodology in promulgating the regulations. API contended that Congress mandated that the EPA incorporate two main factors for determining BCT in Section 304(b)(4)(B). The first factor is an industry cost-effectiveness test. The second factor is a test that compares the cost for private industry to reduce its effluent level with that incurred by publicly owned treatment works (POTW) for a similar purpose. API asserted that the EPA only considered the POTW comparison test factor and that the EPA’s benchmark used was arbitrary and capricious. API had other challenges, including that the EPA used statistically unreliable and internally inconsistent data.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ervin, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership