American Postal Workers Union, Headquarters Local 6885 v. American Postal Workers Union

665 F.2d 1096 (1981)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

American Postal Workers Union, Headquarters Local 6885 v. American Postal Workers Union

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
665 F.2d 1096 (1981)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

The American Postal Workers Union (the national union) (defendant) represented mail-processing employees and negotiated a collective-bargaining agreement (the national agreement) with the United States Postal Service. As of 1972, the national union’s constitution entitled employees to ratify the national agreement by a majority vote. Thereafter, the national union became the bargaining representative for some smaller non-mail-processing-employee bargaining units. The national union negotiated a tentative collective-bargaining agreement with the United States Postal Service to cover the non-mail-processing employees. The national union took the position that non-mail-processing employees did not have the right to ratify their collective-bargaining agreement. Local 6885 (the local union) (plaintiff) sued the national union in district court, alleging that the national union’s failure to allow for ratification of the proposed agreement violated the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA). The district court ruled against the local union. An appeal followed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Mikva, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership