American Wildlands v. Browner

260 F.3d 1192 (2001)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

American Wildlands v. Browner

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
260 F.3d 1192 (2001)

Facts

American Wildlands (plaintiff) challenged Browner’s (EPA) (defendant) approval of certain Montana water quality standards pursuant to the Clean Water Act. The Montana legislature exempted certain nonpoint sources of pollution from antidegradation review. Montana also issued policies and procedures for mixing zones. Its rules provided that if degradation to a body of water at the edge of a mixing zone is not significant, an antidegradation review of the mixed zone is not required. American Wildlands filed suit alleging that the EPA failed to take timely action to approve Montana’s new and revised water quality standards issued under Section 303(c) of the act and that the EPA failed to promptly prepare and promulgate replacement standards for those Montana standards that failed to meet the requirements of the act. The district court held in favor of the EPA. The district court approved each of the EPA’s actions. American Wildlands appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Tacha, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership