Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Analytica, Inc. v. NPD Research, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
708 F.2d 1263 (2003)


Facts

NPD, Inc. (NPD) (defendant), a market research firm, desired to transfer stock shares to Malec, one of the firm’s three co-owners. NPD authorized Malec to hire a lawyer to coordinate the transfer. Malec hired an attorney with the firm of Schwartz & Freeman. NPD provided the attorney with information about the company’s finances and paid the bill for the attorney’s services. Malec left NPD. Later, Malec and his wife, also a former employee of NPD, formed a competing market research company named Analytica, Inc. (Analytica) (plaintiff). Analytica hired Schwartz & Freeman to prosecute anticompetitive behavior claims against NPD. Schwartz & Freeman hired a second firm to serve as trial counsel. Upon motion by NPD, the court ordered both firms disqualified and additionally ordered Schwartz & Freeman to pay $25,000 to NPD for contesting the disqualification. The law firms appealed the disqualification orders.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Posner, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Coffey, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.