Andersen Consulting LLP v. UOP
United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
991 F. Supp. 1041 (1998)
- Written by Alex Ruskell, JD
Facts
UOP (defendant) hired Andersen Consulting LLP (plaintiff) to perform a systems-integration project for UOP. UOP allowed Andersen employees to use UOP’s internal email system. UOP eventually fired Andersen and released some of the Andersen employee emails to the Wall Street Journal. The journal published the emails’ contents, and Andersen sued UOP. Andersen claimed that UOP had violated the Electronic Communications Privacy Act by divulging the contents of the emails to the journal. UOP moved to dismiss, arguing that a nonpublic email provider was not covered by the act.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bucklo, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.