From our private database of 32,200+ case briefs...
Anderson v. Dyco Petroleum Corporation
Oklahoma Supreme Court
1989 OK, 132, 782 P.2d 1367, 107 O. & G.R. 504 (1989)
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company (Panhandle) (defendant) purchased natural gas from Dyco Petroleum Corporation (Dyco), one of several working-interest owners in a natural-gas well. Panhandle and Dyco were the only parties to the sales contract; the remaining working-interest owners were not party to the agreement. A group of other working-interest owners in the well (plaintiffs) sued Panhandle for conversion, arguing that they were entitled to part of the sales price. The trial court granted summary judgment to Panhandle. The plaintiffs appealed to the Oklahoma Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Lavender, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 585,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 585,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 32,200 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.