Anderson v. Griswold
Colorado Supreme Court
No. 23SA300, 2023 WL 8870111 (2023)
- Written by Jamie Milne, JD
Facts
President Donald Trump hosted a rally in Washington DC on January 6, 2021, the day Congress was to certify the Electoral College votes from the November 2020 presidential election. Trump alleged that the election results were fraudulent and encouraged supporters to contest them. Rally attendees, allegedly encouraged by Trump, marched on the Capitol and used force to overcome barriers and law enforcement and enter the building. The congressional session was temporarily suspended as congressmembers were evacuated to safety. Trump subsequently ran for president in the 2024 election. Some of Colorado’s electors from the Electoral College (plaintiffs) sued Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold (defendant), seeking an injunction preventing her from including Trump’s name on the state’s presidential-primary ballot. They argued that Trump’s inclusion was prohibited by the state election code because his involvement in the events of January 6 disqualified him from holding the presidential office under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment, known as the Insurrection Clause. The trial court denied the petition, concluding that although Trump had engaged in insurrection, Section 3 did not apply to the presidential office, and Trump was therefore not disqualified. The Colorado Supreme Court granted review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
Dissent (Boatright, C.J.)
Dissent (Samour, J.)
Dissent (Berkenkotter, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 913,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,300 briefs, keyed to 999 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

